Self consistent citation by Nelson Tansu

Nelson Tansu like to call himself the youngest professor and greatest man in the world. He compare himself with Albert Einstein.

He like to duplicate his research so it is published twice or three times in different places. for example this paper which has the same content appear more than once
- Self-consistent gain analysis of type-II ‘W’ InGaN–GaNAs quantum well lasers
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=4915806

-Self-Consistent Optical Gain Analysis and Epitaxy of Strain-Compensated InGaN-AlGaN Quantum Wells for Laser Applications
http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?URI=CLEO-2008-CMI2

- Self-Consistent Analysis of Strain-Compensated InGaN–AlGaN Quantum Wells for Lasers and Light-Emitting Diodes
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F3%2F4675284%2F04675289.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4675289&authDecision=-203

He just change few words and sentences to make like he make a lot of research.
A research also found out that Nelson Tansu self consistent making self citation. This self consistent analysis of quantum well is a proof of self citation.
This is called Self-Plagiarism and Self-Citation, http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/SCSP-09.html

A Professor Roger Clarke Identified  this behavior of Nelson Tansu as
(1) Self-Plagiarism of a Work
Occasional examples come to light of a paper being published, in identical form, in two journals. This is prima facie a grievous breach of ethics, because it represents fraudulent claims of originality. The breach is all the more serious if there is evidence of active intent to defraud, such as the provision of a different title or abstract, but an identical body. (see example above)

(2) Self-Plagiarism of a Substantial Portion
A new paper may use a 'substantial portion' of a prior work. Examples include:
the outline description of the research program/project;
the rehearsal of the theoretical foundations;
the depiction of the research method adopted.

(3) Self-Plagiarim of a Small but Significant Portion
The term 'substantial' is vague, but implies both quantity and substance. In some circumstances, a small quantity may nonetheless be of sufficient substance that attribution is warranted, if only as a matter of self-defence. Such 'small but significant portions' include critical passages of text, a critical concept and even a key phrase or neologism, but particularly key diagrams.

(4) Self-Plagiarism of a Small and Insignificant Portion
Attribution in the form of a citation is unnecessary in the case of other short passages, simple diagrams, segments of diagrams, phrases, or unremarkable neologisms.
rofessional jealousies play an important role in preventing individuals from in effect recommending themselves into a respected position within a discipline. Reputation is earned, not promulgated; and standing is granted by one's seniors and peers, not asserted.

(5) Self-Citation by Authors
Nelson Tansu seek to create and sustain their 'brand'. This is achieved by being noticed. An author can be noticed because of what they publish, how often they publish, the locations in which they publish, the specific citations that their publications garner in later papers, and overall citation-counts.
This is a proven in recent research by Nelson tansu on self consistent self citation analysis http://www.scribd.com/doc/52567434/ConsistentselfcitationNelsonTansu